iar 221-02 extra credit [is design all a matter of opinion?]

Is design simply a matter of opinion? Or are there other factors that help define what is good design? Consider interior design. Consider interior architecture. Does one need a formal education in order to be considered a good, qualified work? I think it depends on the individual’s situation. Stories of people who have built themselves into something and have grown into success on their own are inspiring, intriguing even, but are they enough to separate themselves from those with credentials? Or is experience a more important factor to differentiate themselves? I personally think that experience and credentials go hand in hand. As you gain experience, whether it is on your own or through education, the amount of credit you can then grant yourself increases as well. Experience is essential in design, and a good way to gain a great amount of experience is by building your credentials through education. I believe it is commendable to be successful entirely on your own, but ultimately I feel that education is the best preparation for the industry. You are critiqued by a variety of people, giving you the opportunity to design for different styles. You also are given the opportunity to build up your portfolio when you go to school. As far as media in relation to design, I feel that the media presents a surfaced view of what design, especially interior design, truly is. Shows such as Design Star give society this idea that anyone can be a designer. They design with affordability as a main goal, as opposed to firmness and delight. This leads me back to my opening question, is design simply a matter of opinion? If the audience who is exposed to design in the media enjoy it, and learn simple ways of improving their home, is it really a crime to us? I feel as though those who are intrigued by design in the way that we are who go to school for it cannot judge those shows necessarily, but it really is a matter of opinion.