Monday, February 14, 2011

RR5_2/14/11_adaption or evolution

adaption or evolution.

Transformation occurs with everything, and occurs differently according to the subject undergoing change. When observing transformation in architecture, one must begin to think about form and function, and how they must evolve with the context surrounding it during the time. Considering the Roman Empire for example, the function of their architecture began to shift according to what was going on in their society, how they began to view the world. Purpose that began for comfort and pleasure then transformed into a purpose centered around religion. Qualities of architecture such as details and elaboration began to be replaced by simplicity, a reflection of their new views of themselves and the world.

"This emphasis of Roman life on the here and now was gradually replaced with a very different concern for the hereafter through the influence of a new religion that reshaped the way Romans began to think about the world and themselves."

Now is this new change considered an evolution, as previously discussed, or simply adaption? Thinking of how the world of architecture has changed since then, there is still bits and pieces of influences you can see from previous objects, buildings, places, and spaces, so then is it simply change through adaption with precedents? I believe that adaption and evolution go hand and hand. In order to go through change, whether it be structural or spiritual, one must do so in consideration of their surroundings, and the time period in which they choose to, or don't choose to, go through. The Roman empire, however, it appeared they had no choice. With Constantine as the new ruler, the Christian faith was the new development, the new life. And with this change, came adaption, the people then had to adjust in order to fulfill their new purpose of life with religious experience.

When considering a change dealing with something as personal as religion, the time one takes to think about what the space is used for is enhanced just the same, only in a different sense. The exterior grew less detailed, the focus becoming the interior and it's relation to the personal religious experience one would feel within the space. A creation of an atmosphere, one with a intricate exposure and connection between this world and heaven. Adjusting to the time period they were exposed to at the time. Adaption. And transforming the form and function of such a building, place, or space. Evolution.

1 comment:

  1. Nice post including your thoughts...is that a quote from ching or roth? Be sure to use citations. Also, include you annotated images. Should be labeled RR5...then your title + concept.

    ReplyDelete